"Christian" or Christ-Like?

I've been thinking a lot lately about how we label things "secular" and "Christian". I haven't quite reached a conclusion on the matter yet, but I'm pretty sure this is a pointless exercise.

Sure, it makes organizing things more convenient. We know that "Christian" radio is safe for the family and "secular" radio is most often not. We'd much rather bear "Christian" messages on our t-shirts than "secular" ones. We might even venture to say that hanging out with "Christian" people is much better than hanging out with "secular" people.

Well, I'm sorry if this makes you a little uncomfortable, but that's not what Christianity is about. Not the way I understand it, at least. Please don't take me as any sort of authority - this is simply the musings of some kid that you have no real reason to listen to. But why do we need labels?! I know that the issue of labels has been addressed time and time again these days. Seriously, though, are we that concerned with being "safe" and comfortable?

Brant Hansen, a radio personality on Air1, wrote about this very idea. It's partially what inspired my thoughts. Here's a bit of what he had to say:

I don't believe in a line between sacred and secular.

A tree isn't "secular."  A car isn't "secular."  And, while most agree my accordion will not be in heaven, it isn't "secular", either.

There are Christians in the music business, and not just in the "Christian Music Business."  Some of the best "Christian Musicians" will never win Dove Awards.  They play bass trombone for the Boston Symphony (Douglas Yeo) or principal trumpet for the NY Philharmonic (Phil Smith) or sing mezzo soprano for the Metropolitan Opera, like Wendy White.  They're not "secular."  They're gifted by God as artists, participating in His creativity, Soli Deo Gloria.

And your job?  Your computer isn't secular.  If you mop a floor at work, you're not mopping a secular floor.  If you're mowing grass, you're not mowing secular grass.

It's God's grass, man.

And Jesus didn't change water into secular wine.

You can now buy Christian-marketed pants.  Does that mean my current pants are secular?  Have the Christian pants truly repented?  And what can be done to reach my pants for Christ?

(Go check out the whole post here)


With his classic humor and fresh perspective, he brings up a very valid point. What do we even mean by "secular" or "Christian"?

I should make it clear that I'm not opposed to "Christian" things. I wear Kerusso t-shirts, I listen to Christian music 80% of the time, and most of my friendships come from church-related activities. I'm not condemning the intent of the "in the world, but not of it" attitude. I do, however, think that we (referring to the Church as a whole) are a little too concerned with the "Christian" label.

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. (Romans 8:28)

Did you catch that? In all things. God can use anything and everything - secular and sacred, religious and rebellious - for his glory. Let's focus on who Christ is, rather than on branding his label on everything we make. This will spill over into a truer faith, and a truer love for others. 

• What if we were more concerned about loving people in the name of Christ than about where they are on Sunday mornings? 

• What if we spent our energy using our gifts to further God's kingdom rather than to appeal to a specific religious audience? 

If I understand correctly, Christianity is simply about being Christ-like. That's the focus. Jesus hung out with the sinners. The people who listened to the first century Nicki Minaj. The people who definitely didn't own any Christian t-shirts. These are the people Jesus sought out. Their labels didn't matter, because that's not the  focus. The focus is the heart.

Let's let our hearts be changed. Let's not worry about being "Christian" enough, and start seeking to be Christ-like.